<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1+1+1 = More than Three on Clean Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://upandrunning.entrepreneur.com/2008/11/13/111-more-than-three-on-clean-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://upandrunning.entrepreneur.com/2008/11/13/111-more-than-three-on-clean-energy/</link>
	<description>Starting your business with growth in mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Berry</title>
		<link>http://upandrunning.entrepreneur.com/2008/11/13/111-more-than-three-on-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upandrunning.entrepreneur.com/?p=407#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>@Mac thanks for the comment, your disagreement is welcome, but I&#039;m not at all convinced that it&#039;s that simple. No problems with nuclear power? No hope for new technology or innovation? We&#039;ve already harnessed the full wind map? Nothing more to do with solar energy? Really, are you that certain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mac thanks for the comment, your disagreement is welcome, but I&#8217;m not at all convinced that it&#8217;s that simple. No problems with nuclear power? No hope for new technology or innovation? We&#8217;ve already harnessed the full wind map? Nothing more to do with solar energy? Really, are you that certain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://upandrunning.entrepreneur.com/2008/11/13/111-more-than-three-on-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upandrunning.entrepreneur.com/?p=407#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>With respect to your first point, the only sort of clean energy that is capable of sufficient output to matter is nuclear power, which doesn&#039;t need development, it just needs money -- quite a lot more than $15 billion annually to matter.

All the feel-good chit chat in the world isn&#039;t going to alter the national wind map (look it up), nor will it move the sunbelt and boost solar panel efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to your first point, the only sort of clean energy that is capable of sufficient output to matter is nuclear power, which doesn&#8217;t need development, it just needs money &#8212; quite a lot more than $15 billion annually to matter.</p>
<p>All the feel-good chit chat in the world isn&#8217;t going to alter the national wind map (look it up), nor will it move the sunbelt and boost solar panel efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
